|
Post by chica on Aug 1, 2005 19:45:23 GMT -5
yes but what about killing another living thing just for "fun" is that right to you?
|
|
|
Post by Lobstrosity on Aug 1, 2005 20:44:27 GMT -5
Well that isn't the debate here. The debate is killing animals for their fur, not for fun.
But I guess that is a valid question, especially for the animal rights thread.
Hmmmm. . . Well, I think there isn't really a problem with hunting for fun. It is a sport, although it is done at the expense of animals. . .
Well, all right I'll compromise. I'll say that hunting for fun is okay. But only in moderation. Only a few hunting permits every hunting season.
|
|
|
Post by chica on Aug 10, 2005 17:59:14 GMT -5
well it's not what I wanted to hear but it was close. lol
|
|
|
Post by Decieved by the Truth on Aug 13, 2005 16:13:53 GMT -5
not to mention the fact that it takes maybe a minute to find out whether its breathing or theres a pulse. [glow=red,2,300]hey, would you want to check if a seal whose head tou just smashed with a bat still had a pulse? I know I wouldnt. and I dont think anyone else would either. I would just rather skin it. call me lazy, but thats how life is. people are lazy.[/glow]
|
|
|
Post by chica on Aug 28, 2005 20:57:24 GMT -5
yes but when it is hurting the animal I would make sure to check because I actually care and have a heart
|
|
|
Post by Lobstrosity on Aug 28, 2005 22:05:20 GMT -5
"Having a heart" is not defined as making sure animals are alive. You would do well to remember that.
|
|