|
Post by Lobstrosity on Apr 29, 2005 23:33:21 GMT -5
Careful now, i'm not into all that feeding the hungry nonsense either. But the other stuff you said was pure gold.
And whats this about teens getting free abortions?? That's an outrage!!! Tell me where the place is and I will set fire to it!
|
|
|
Post by KiddoFreak on Apr 29, 2005 23:40:56 GMT -5
Heh, I was being fairly sarcastic with the whole feeding the hungry thing, seeing as that is another controversy over money. By "free" I meant government-aided, sorry, kinda tired at the moment and I feel like greatly eggagerating.
|
|
|
Post by Lobstrosity on Apr 29, 2005 23:44:11 GMT -5
Government aided abortion is just as bad. The liberals in congress want my money to be spent on killing babies and feeding murderers. No, that's just not right.
|
|
|
Post by Azan on Apr 30, 2005 9:37:41 GMT -5
Well I think what was ment by the free abortions is that it would cost more to put the child in an orphinage for his childhood, but thats just my guess (i dont agree with it though)
|
|
|
Post by chica on May 1, 2005 20:15:11 GMT -5
i get what you guys are saying and all that. like a girl could go out and fool around how many ever times she wants and then just depend on getting an abortion each time she got pregnant. I mean I could see how you would want restrictions so that would never happen but sometimes it's either a girls own life or the childs. I mean they are ruining their lives anyway by getting pregnant why can't they have a way to get out? on the other hand abortion is the easy way out and if they are more restricted to get then it might make the girl think before she gets pregnant. but idk I am still for abortion
|
|
|
Post by Lobstrosity on May 1, 2005 20:22:01 GMT -5
Okay, so the girl should be able to run her own life. But as soon as running her life involves getting an abortion, she is really running someone else's life as well. And she is running that life right on into death before that life has a chance.
|
|
|
Post by chica on May 1, 2005 20:23:58 GMT -5
well yes. I mean it is horrible but like I have said before that life that didn't get a chance probably didn't want the chance anyway cuz it would turn out crappy with a teenage mom. I mean yes there is adoption but most girls wanna hold on to their babies and that just ruins both lives
|
|
|
Post by Lobstrosity on May 1, 2005 20:26:59 GMT -5
Well maybe we could have a forced adoption program. But when you say that that baby that is aborted probably wouldn't want their chance at life, really you are just dictating how that child should feel, and whenever you start telling someone else how they should feel, you know it's going to end up badly.
|
|
|
Post by chica on May 1, 2005 20:29:40 GMT -5
you know what just I think the forced adoption program would be awesome but I do have just one question I have asked you why you wanna let a baby live but then have a criminal die. first let me just tell you that the criminal may not be bad himself, the CHOICES he made were bad. but how can you say "give life to the baby" and then turn around and say "take life away from a grown baby"?
|
|
|
Post by Lobstrosity on May 1, 2005 20:45:50 GMT -5
the baby has all kinds of possibilities, but the "grown baby," as you put it, has already made some poor decisions that merit his own execution. If a baby showed any sign of being evil, I would vote that we go ahead and abort the baby.
|
|
|
Post by chica on May 1, 2005 20:47:39 GMT -5
do you count ruining a girls life as evil? or her chance at life as evil?
|
|
|
Post by Lobstrosity on May 1, 2005 20:59:15 GMT -5
she ruined her life, not me
|
|
|
Post by chica on May 1, 2005 21:00:54 GMT -5
what if you were the father what would you say then?
|
|
|
Post by Lobstrosity on May 1, 2005 21:02:58 GMT -5
Then I would give my best shot at raising the child, not forfeit the life of the child to maintain the stability of my own life.
|
|
|
Post by chica on May 1, 2005 21:05:55 GMT -5
even if it means giving up your life? your hopes and dreams? college a chance at a good job?
|
|