Post by Lobstrosity on Jul 1, 2006 18:04:35 GMT -5
Well if more people complain, then it shows that it's a much stronger point. Then that means less people will want it, and it won't do as well, and isn't that what this is about? And I can think of a lot of things about all these systems that are bad. I don't know much about any of them because I don't spend any time researching them, everything I know is from what all y'all keep arguing about. I'm probably not gonna get one, so my opinions are relatively unbiased.
Besides just the stupid name, the Wii seems to be putting a lot of faith into the one thing that makes it stand out: that weird pointing controller thing. I don't know how far that can get them, it's just a controller, and as someone already said, without it, it's pretty much the same as everything that came before it.
The PS3 is the same thing as the PS2 it looks like, but with a couple more (maybe more expensive) games and apparently the system itself is more expensive. I can't back up a system that's making already expensive things cost even more, and if it's at all like the PS2, it's a fair bet that people who buy it might end up with an expensive paperweight a few months after they get it.
Which brings me to the last of the three (is it the only one that's out already?) the X-Box 360, I don't know if they fixed the glitches I kept hearing about, but since even I heard about them, they probably did. Therefore the X-Box 360 is probably more reliable than the PS3, but other than that, it is basically the same thing: More expensive system with a few new games. On the bright side, the X-Box 360 is pretty much guaranteed to have the best graphics. You can say you don't care about graphics, but better graphics never hurt.
Besides just the stupid name, the Wii seems to be putting a lot of faith into the one thing that makes it stand out: that weird pointing controller thing. I don't know how far that can get them, it's just a controller, and as someone already said, without it, it's pretty much the same as everything that came before it.
The PS3 is the same thing as the PS2 it looks like, but with a couple more (maybe more expensive) games and apparently the system itself is more expensive. I can't back up a system that's making already expensive things cost even more, and if it's at all like the PS2, it's a fair bet that people who buy it might end up with an expensive paperweight a few months after they get it.
Which brings me to the last of the three (is it the only one that's out already?) the X-Box 360, I don't know if they fixed the glitches I kept hearing about, but since even I heard about them, they probably did. Therefore the X-Box 360 is probably more reliable than the PS3, but other than that, it is basically the same thing: More expensive system with a few new games. On the bright side, the X-Box 360 is pretty much guaranteed to have the best graphics. You can say you don't care about graphics, but better graphics never hurt.