PowerMad
Silver Member
OBJECTION!
Posts: 127
|
Post by PowerMad on Sept 9, 2005 15:41:11 GMT -5
This is like when people turn on a tv or radio to a buzz channel and claim they hear voices. Its meaning is "electronic voice phenominom" or however you spell that. I'm not sure on this, some people might just be to paranoid when turning on a tv but there's some pretty weird things out there.
|
|
|
|
Post by Vash on Sept 9, 2005 17:29:05 GMT -5
I dunno, I'm thinking that's caused from paranoia. But anything's possible.
|
|
|
|
Post by KiddoFreak on Sept 9, 2005 17:56:41 GMT -5
Well, the idea of ghosts seems pretty well accepted around here, why not EVP? It's basically the same thing but applying to the auditory senses instead of the optical ones. Personally, I don't believe in it.
|
|
PowerMad
Silver Member
OBJECTION!
Posts: 127
|
Post by PowerMad on Sept 9, 2005 18:07:14 GMT -5
This extends to more then electronics, basically the idea of entiretys exsisting in inanimate objects. "EVP are unexpected voices found in recording media. ITC is a newer term that includes all of the ways these unexpected voices and images are collected through technology, including EVP. Of the many hypotheses designed to explain these phenomena, the Survival Hypothesis has been found to be most effective in answering the evidence. The Survival Hypothesis holds that we are nonphysical entities who are able to exist in the physical aspect of reality because of our physical body, but that when our physical body dies, we as Self, change our point of view to nonphysical reality. In effect, we exist before and after our current lifetime. The working hypothesis supported by AA-EVP is that these messages are, indeed, nonphysical in origin and that the Survival Hypothesis is essentially correct. However, even though the fact of these messages can be demonstrated, their origin cannot. Considering this, it is the goal of AA-EVP and its membership to find ways to improve the reception of these messages and to better understand their origin."    |
|
|
|
Post by Azan on Sept 9, 2005 18:25:26 GMT -5
Ill stick with my view for anything paranormal.
Science cant disproove it, however it can proove it, so untill its proven I shall remain sceptical. Always keep an open mind.
And those pics easily could have been photoshopped, all it takes is someone to make one pic transparent over the other with some blending techniques you can get that affect.
|
|
|
|
Post by Vash on Sept 11, 2005 8:42:22 GMT -5
Ok, I can see the images in the bottom 2 pics. But I'm not sure where it is in the top pic...
|
|
|
|
Post by Azan on Sept 11, 2005 10:14:11 GMT -5
The second pic is just a zoomed in version of the top pic, and the third one has had an effect applied to it so its easier to see I believe.
|
|
|
|
Post by Vash on Sept 11, 2005 11:44:49 GMT -5
Ah, that makes sense. Although, the 1st one then seems believable, the bottom one seems photoshopped...
|
|
|
|
Post by Azan on Sept 11, 2005 11:59:46 GMT -5
Its all the same one, so they all have the same believability, the bottom one has been photoshopped so that you can see it better, they just did that so if you couldnt see what it was in the top one you can see it in the bottom one as a refrence.  |
|
|
|
Post by Sad Baby Green on Sept 18, 2005 18:24:14 GMT -5
Eh...I am no sure of my view on this it is pretty much comlicated...it is the same prespective as to ghost to me. I am not so sure what to think personally. It is possible but I have never encountered it myself to believe it is true. So, I am skeptical.
|
|
