|
Post by Azan on Apr 19, 2005 12:50:25 GMT -5
My personal view is that as long as it can or will save a human life we should do it, I would rather have 20000 puppies be slain than 1 human.
|
|
|
Post by Lobstrosity on Apr 19, 2005 14:56:12 GMT -5
Now this is a question worthy of my superior intellect. How many animals would I rather have killed than one human? In other words, what is the going rate of animals vs. people? I'm going to have to spend some time pondering your query, so I will not vote yet.
|
|
|
Post by Azan on Apr 19, 2005 14:57:24 GMT -5
Now this is a question worthy of my superior intellect. How many animals would I rather have killed than one human? In other words, what is the going rate of animals vs. people? I'm going to have to spend some time pondering this question, so I will not vote yet. Then again it also determines what kind of animal, lets say rats because they are fairly unusful in our economy, unlinke something like cows Edited: also the question was do you support animal testing, not how many animals lives it takes to equal a humans
|
|
|
Post by chica on Apr 19, 2005 15:23:13 GMT -5
I WOULD RATHER SEE YOU DEAD THAN ANY ANIMAL!!!!!!!!!!!! it is inhumane. sometimes what comes up as a side effect to any animal (A RAT!) may not be a side effect in humans! do you know some of the ways they test animals??? okay I did a report on it and the pictures I found were so sad and these animals were dying just for us! how selfish can we be?
|
|
|
Post by Lobstrosity on Apr 19, 2005 15:25:43 GMT -5
Animals don't care if they die. Most of them anyway.
|
|
|
Post by Azan on Apr 19, 2005 15:26:46 GMT -5
I WOULD RATHER SEE YOU DEAD THAN ANY ANIMAL!!!!!!!!!!!! it is inhumane. sometimes what comes up as a side effect to any animal (A RAT!) may not be a side effect in humans! do you know some of the ways they test animals??? okay I did a report on it and the pictures I found were so sad and these animals were dying just for us! how selfish can we be? I admit that its horrible and evil, but if I had to choose between a human or some lab rats ide take the human, however I do not support non medical testing of animals, thats inhumain and it doesnt aid human life. Animal testing has done wonders for humanity, the space program and almost all of our medicine I guarantee you if we didnt have it humanity eould still be in the dark ages for medicine
|
|
|
Post by Azan on Apr 19, 2005 15:27:44 GMT -5
Animals don't care if they die. Most of them anyway. Heh thats true, animals are incapable of thought, therefore inferior to humans.
|
|
|
Post by chica on Apr 19, 2005 15:28:04 GMT -5
yes I agree it has helped but can't we find another way to get help? I mean yes it's good to get on in technology but at what cost? the lives of animals? I don't think so.
|
|
|
Post by chica on Apr 19, 2005 15:28:35 GMT -5
YOU are inferior to humans
|
|
|
Post by Azan on Apr 19, 2005 15:29:46 GMT -5
yes I agree it has helped but can't we find another way to get help? I mean yes it's good to get on in technology but at what cost? the lives of animals? I don't think so. what do you suggest we do, the only other alternative I can see is human testing but then we would have dead humans everywhere.
|
|
|
Post by chica on Apr 19, 2005 15:30:56 GMT -5
so? then cats would take over the world and I would be their leader!!!! *evil laugh*
|
|
|
Post by Lobstrosity on Apr 19, 2005 15:31:00 GMT -5
Animals don't care if they die. They are mentally incapable such feelings as sympathy or compassion.
|
|
|
Post by Azan on Apr 19, 2005 15:44:56 GMT -5
Ok it seems to me we are going to need a list of its pros and cons Pro ~ Benifits/Saves Human Life ~ Drugs can work better ~ Cheap
Cons ~ Inhumain
well that list suks, if anyone can make a better list, or add to mine feel free to do so
|
|
|
Post by Umbrafire on Apr 19, 2005 17:11:31 GMT -5
sure, it's wrong, but what are the alternatives?
|
|
|
Post by Azan on Apr 19, 2005 17:12:15 GMT -5
sure, it's wrong, but what are the alternatives? exactly
|
|