|
Post by chica on Oct 15, 2005 13:43:22 GMT -5
we're igoring this thread or at least the reason why it was posted. thus we started a converstion about the abinary code! yay!
|
|
|
Post by Azan on Oct 15, 2005 13:55:31 GMT -5
w00t btw, can you explain further how it is that you use this? Sometimes when I write to a big text file I convert all the ACII to binary, this makes the file harder to read, then I encrypt it thus making it quite unhackable.
|
|
|
Post by chica on Oct 16, 2005 18:34:52 GMT -5
yay no hackers!!!!!!!!!
|
|
|
Post by Sad Baby Green on Oct 17, 2005 10:03:11 GMT -5
Uhhh...whats an abinary code?
|
|
|
Post by Azan on Oct 17, 2005 15:19:12 GMT -5
Uhhh...whats an abinary code? My guess is an abinary code would be any code that isnt binary, its like abiotic/biotic... or in this case I think it might be a typo. Now lets move on to pointless discussion of file encryption, ill explain the basics of it for those who dont know (and I discovered this method myself while sleeping in math class one day last year. Yes its that easy, I wasnt even thinking about the subject of file encryption) But lets say you have the numbers 1 3 3 7 and you want to encrypt them, first you have a variable, this is the encryption key (EK for short) then you have another variable that is the numbers position in the line, We will call this variable x so it looks like this. So for 1 x=1 3 x=2 3 x=3 7 x=4 Now we can add the original to the x value getting this string of numbers 2 5 6 11 but its still pretty easy to hack, so we will move on to our EK, lets say our EK is 2 you can multiply it to x before we added it to 1 3 3 7 so we would get 3 7 9 21 And thats the basics, if you wanted to you could add more encyption variables and add/subtract/multiply/divide them accordingly and this is just a really basic method I came up with, its hackable but its to the point where the time taking to hack it wouldnt be worth it (Usualy . And please note that there is a pattern, I have a much better method but I prefer not to show people how it works In order for this to work properly with letters you cant have the letters be like this. A=1 B=2 C=3 etc. etc. if you truly want it perfect make A=35 B=4 C=23 but I wouldnt go above 50.
The reason why this works is if a person just sees a bunch of numbers say 34 65 12 32 and even if they know the method you used to encrypt them they could be guessing with the encryption key and it wouldnt help them at all, because they wouldnt know which numbers were right and which were wrong. (unless of course they knew what A equaled etc. etc.)
|
|
|
Post by Qecbum on Oct 18, 2005 19:50:37 GMT -5
wow I feel dumber and dumber every time I read your posts even thou my iq is pushing 140
allthou I do reilize that that does not normaly reprisnet the level of intellagence andd that you have more exspreinace with programing and I only have expreiance with hardware inlastation upkeep and repair
(note I am not posting in this thread I am just saying this I still will not say anthing eles on the subject all I have to say is that for about two pages this has been off topic)
|
|
|
Post by Lobstrosity on Oct 18, 2005 23:50:02 GMT -5
Really? It's off topic? I wonder who's fault that is?
(Not implying it was your fault, spike)
|
|
|
Post by Qecbum on Oct 19, 2005 7:23:09 GMT -5
is it really my falt???
oh well then carry on with the code thing
|
|
|
Post by Lobstrosity on Oct 19, 2005 16:28:41 GMT -5
Uh no, I said it wasn't your fault. I was thinking it was more so Chica's fault. Oh well, carry on with the code thing.
|
|
|
Post by Azan on Oct 19, 2005 18:08:38 GMT -5
It went off topic cus no one wants to talk about that subject But anyways in response to Spikes post. "wow I feel dumber and dumber every time I read your posts even thou my iq is pushing 140 allthou I do reilize that that does not normaly reprisnet the level of intellagence andd that you have more exspreinace with programing and I only have expreiance with hardware inlastation upkeep and repair" I came up with that encryption before I knew programming its just a really basic method that you can do in your head, if it was the encryption method in my program it would be near impossible to do without a calculator and a whole lot of time (even if you knew the key and everything, the number of equations is ... lets just say a crap load) But just try it out, come up with your own method that follows mine, you will see how easy it is once you understand it.
|
|
|
Post by Vash on Oct 20, 2005 13:14:46 GMT -5
Like any other thread, if you don't want to talk about the real subject, you should just make a new thread and post what you want to talk about there, not spam them and go off topic.
|
|
|
Post by Azan on Oct 20, 2005 13:24:35 GMT -5
Like any other thread, if you don't want to talk about the real subject, you should just make a new thread and post what you want to talk about there, not spam them and go off topic. Technicaly its not spam, technicaly its not off topic because all Jiub had said was that he doesnt want to talk about this anymore, it wasnt even supposed to be discussed so as soon as he said that the thread became an off topic thread therefor anything is on topic.
|
|
|
Post by Umbrafire on Oct 20, 2005 13:27:25 GMT -5
The topic of this thread was to let people know that im tired of what has been going on, and I think that everyone should just drop it. That was the topic. I dont care what the topic is now.
|
|
|
Post by Azan on Oct 20, 2005 13:30:41 GMT -5
wow I just read back to page 4, this is a steady stream of conversation so the topic has changed. CHica started it with binary, then programming then programming with binary then file encryption, I would say that the old topic is gone because no one want to talk about it anymore therefore...
|
|
|
Post by Lobstrosity on Oct 20, 2005 14:40:15 GMT -5
. . . lock the thread?
|
|